The criteria for the new debtor include the acceptance of the new debtor, the acceptance of liability by the new debtor and the acceptance of the new contract by the former debtor as the full performance of the old contract. Novation is not a unilateral contractual mechanism, which, in the new circumstances, gives way to negotiations on the new GGV. Thus, “the adoption of the new treaty as a full execution of the old contract” can be read in conjunction with the phenomenon of “mutual consent of the CGV”.  The new contract has the same conditions as the previous one, with the exception of the replacement or complement of the parties. Innovation has the effect of altering the parties that have the rights and obligations of the treaty without necessarily altering those rights and obligations. Innovation is achieved through an innovation agreement (an agreement) by existing and new parties that requires the agreement of all parties involved.  Although the gap between attribution and innovation is relatively small, this is an essential difference. If you assign a novate, you may be able to be responsible for your original contract if the other party is not required to meet its obligations. Therefore, while the client can theoretically cede the right to an appropriate design of a building, it is not known what right would give rise to an action for damages in the event of an infringement. If the developer (who would generally be the contractor) sold the building or created a complete repair contract, then his right to nominal damages would be only. This is a situation in which you should certainly use an act of innovation. The concepts of innovation and use have been developed to overcome the constraints imposed by doctrine.
An example of innovation is the fact that a contractor is doing work in progress for a client, but the contractor is in the process of selling his business to a third party. Once an act of innovation has been put in place, a new contract has been entered into and the third party obtains the rights and obligations arising from the contract with the client. For example, if there is a contract in which Dan Einen will give the TV to Alex and another contract in which Alex Becky will give a television, then it is possible to renew both contracts and replace them with a single contract where Dan agrees to give Becky a television. Unlike the assignment, the Novation must be approved by all parties. The new contract has yet to be considered, but it is generally assumed that the previous contract will be executed. Suppose Michael buys a car from Peter, which owes him $5,000 in the sale price until Peter negotiates with the MoT. Michael sells the car to Fred on the same terms. Michael wants to get out, but he has obligations to both sides. Michael is persuasive Peter and Fred to enter into an innovation contract signed by the three, in which Fred Michael assumes commitments to Peter and Fred is now in Michael`s place with Peter. In a novelty, the original contract is extinguished and replaced by a new one, in which a third party accepts rights and obligations that duplicate the rights and obligations of one of the original parties. Novation does not repeal the existing rights and obligations of the original treaty, although the parties may also accept their innovation. The parties must consider each of these issues when deciding whether to cede or renew an agreement: innovation and attribution are opportunities for someone to transfer their interest in a contract to another person.